The perennial question of ‘time in the market’ versus ‘timing the market’ is re-emerging as increasingly relevant as Melbourne’s market winds up for its next growth phase.
It comes amid increased interest from interstate investors, who are considering whether now is the time to buy or whether the market has further to fall ahead of the predicted upswing.
Timing the market versus time in the market represent fundamentally different investment philosophies that can significantly impact investment outcomes, particularly in Melbourne’s nuanced property environment.
Understanding ‘timing the market’ in property investment
Timing the market revolves around a specific mindset focused on purchasing property at its lowest price point. Investors who adopt this approach believe their success hinges primarily on buying at the optimal moment when prices are depressed or before an anticipated upswing.
This strategy involves careful consideration of market cycles, attempting to predict whether prices will rise or fall in the immediate future, and making purchase decisions accordingly.
Proponents of market timing often delay their entry into rising markets, preferring to wait until conditions cool before committing to a purchase, or alternatively, rushing to buy when they sense a market has bottomed out.
Challenges in timing property purchases
Despite its intuitive appeal, timing the market presents several significant challenges that can undermine its effectiveness. The most common pitfall occurs when investors decide to wait for a cooling market, only to watch prices continue to climb for months or even years.
By the time the market eventually slows or experiences a minor correction, property values have often increased substantially from when the investor first considered purchasing. This can see a nominal 5% market correction following a 15-25% price increase – leaving the investor significantly worse off than if they had entered earlier.
While investors also often wait for perfect personal circumstances to buy property – whether starting a new job, planning for children, or saving for a better asset – these ‘ideal’ conditions rarely align perfectly, causing many to miss valuable market entry opportunities.
The intention to save more for a better quality property is admirable, but when markets are rising, this strategy can backfire as property prices typically outpace personal savings rates.
History shows that trying to out-save a moving market is rarely successful, leaving delayed investors perpetually playing catch-up as the equity gap continues to widen between their savings and property values.
Another fundamental challenge lies in identifying the bottom of a market. This is because they are typically only recognisable in retrospect, usually six or more months after they’ve occurred. This means investors waiting for definitive signs often miss the initial recovery phase, which frequently delivers substantial growth as market sentiment improves.
In a subdued market, the quality and selection of available properties present additional complications for timing-focused investors. Discretionary vendors – those who can choose when to sell rather than being forced by circumstances – typically avoid listing their properties during market downturns.
This creates a situation where depressed markets not only offer fewer properties but often lower-quality assets as well. Consequently, investors may find themselves compromising on property fundamentals simply to execute their timing strategy, potentially acquiring inferior assets that underperform regardless of entry timing.
The selling perspective: When timing works better
While timing the market presents numerous challenges when buying, it becomes considerably more effective when applied to property sales. As a property owner, you maintain greater control over when and how your asset enters the market, allowing for more strategic timing decisions.
For example, seasonal considerations play an important role in sales timing strategy. Properties with different characteristics perform better during specific times of the year – those with excellent natural light might showcase better during winter months when the sun sits lower on the horizon, while properties with impressive outdoor spaces typically present more favorably during warmer months. Understanding these seasonal advantages allows sellers to highlight their property’s best features when they’ll make the strongest impression on potential buyers.
Market rhythms throughout the year also influence optimal selling periods. In Melbourne specifically, the property market experiences predictable seasonal fluctuations, with mid-December through late January typically representing a slower period as buyers focus on holidays rather than property acquisitions. Informed sellers typically avoid these periods, instead targeting times of higher buyer engagement to maximise competition and potential sale prices.
Timing the market also allows owners to analyse recent market trends and consider forecasts about where the market is headed in the coming months. These insights can inform decisions about whether to delay listing if market improvements are anticipated, or accelerate their selling timeline if indicators suggest a dip is approaching.
For investment properties, lease considerations introduce additional timing factors. Sellers must evaluate whether their property is under a fixed-term lease or month-to-month arrangement, how much time remains on existing leases, and how the property presents with current renters living there.
In some cases, well-furnished rental properties may present better with renters in place than vacant, while still offering the flexibility of vacant possession through strategic settlement timing. These factors allow for nuanced timing decisions that can enhance sale outcomes without requiring perfect market cycle prediction.
The compounding power of ‘time in the market’
The ‘time in the market’ approach represents a fundamentally different investment philosophy centered on compound growth, and one that we at Wakelin typically recommend.
Compound capital growth has been a consistent focus in our articles and podcasts, as it represents one of the fundamental keys to success in property investment.
This approach embodies a long-term mindset where investors purchase quality properties with the intention of holding them, allowing the powerful growth-on-growth effect to build substantial equity over time.
This stands in contrast to strategies that emphasise securing the lowest possible purchase price as the primary path to equity creation. While focusing solely on buying at the cheapest price might deliver modest short-term benefits, it fails to generate the significant wealth that compound growth produces over extended holding periods.
The mathematics of compounding – not merely the initial discount – ultimately drives meaningful long-term equity growth for successful property investors. Compound growth functions as an exponential rather than linear wealth-building mechanism.
When property increases in value, those gains themselves begin generating further gains in subsequent growth periods. This compounding effect accelerates over time, creating substantially larger equity positions for long-term holders compared to frequent market timers. The mathematics of compounding explains why relatively modest annual growth rates can transform into significant wealth over extended holding periods, often outperforming more aggressive timing strategies that risk missing key growth periods altogether.
Rather than positioning the market as an adversary to be outmaneuvered, this approach seeks to harness market forces as allies in wealth creation. By maintaining quality assets through multiple market cycles, investors allow the natural appreciation of well-selected properties to build substantial equity positions that can later support financial independence.
This perspective recognises that property markets, despite short-term fluctuations, have historically rewarded patient investors who maintain quality assets through complete market cycles.
The time-in-market approach fundamentally alters the investor’s relationship with market movements, ensuring the market works for you, rather than against you.
The $300,000 opportunity cost of waiting: Case study
Several years ago, a client who had fully prepared to purchase an investment property discovered his wife was pregnant shortly after engaging us. Despite having the financial capacity to proceed, the impending lifestyle change prompted him to postpone his investment plans. Five years later, when he returned to resume his property search, comparable properties to what he could have purchased had appreciated by approximately $300,000.
The client later acknowledged that while the pregnancy certainly represented an important life event, their financial position would have comfortably supported both the new family member and the investment property.
Take home message
From a buyer’s perspective, a balanced approach to property investment recognizes that while timing considerations shouldn’t be ignored entirely, it’s the compound growth that ‘time in the market’ offers that provides the strongest long-term wealth creator.
Once your personal circumstances support property investment, the focus should shift toward acquiring quality assets that will perform well over the long term – throughout shorter term market cycles.
The ‘what’ of property selection becomes significantly more important than the ‘when’ of the purchase.
Superior properties consistently outperform mediocre assets regardless of purchase timing.
Listen to Jarrod’s podcast: